Considering the standards of current motorcycles, any motorcycle built before the 1990s seems terrible. But some mistakes unfortunately aren't limited to specific dates, and so we at Senhor Carros are going to show you today what are the worst motorcycles ever produced. 

Just like with cars, it's important not to let emotion guide you when buying a motorcycle. Because, most of the time, looks aren't everything, and that applies to both two-wheeled and four-wheeled vehicles. 

Just like with cars, Brazilians also love motorcycles. And during the pandemic, due to the high demand for delivery services, motorcycle sales exploded, causing a shortage of models in dealerships.

If you're looking for an affordable motorcycle, whether for city or highway riding, we suggest you read our article today before making any purchase. Let's go?

We present a list of the worst two-wheeled machines ever produced. These are motorcycles that defied quality standards, tested the patience of enthusiasts, and in some cases, even risked the safety of their riders. Let's discover the most infamous creations of the motorcycle industry.

In the eyes of motorcycle enthusiasts, the Suzuki GS 500E is not ugly. Far from it. The model is even inexpensive when compared to other 500cc motorcycles. But the positive points end there.

The model has terrible handling, which makes even simple cornering difficult. Furthermore, the GS 500E is known for its deficient brakes, which can leave even the most experienced motorcyclists in trouble. 

Experts say that if you can ride one of these, you can ride any motorcycle. 

Harley Davidson is known for making quality motorcycles. But the 1981 Sportster is not one of those bikes. 

As we mentioned at the beginning of this article, motorcycles produced before the 1990s can easily be considered problematic by current motorcyclists, and this Harley is a classic example of that. 

This motorcycle is clumsy and performs poorly. The problem lies with the long forks, which are very heavy and only work well in a straight line. Therefore, riding it at low speeds and cornering is a real struggle. 

Here we have a real controversy. After all, the Honda Cub is a classic and much-loved motorcycle, and at the same time, it's one of the worst motorcycles ever produced. 

The Cub is one of the best-selling motorcycles in the world and featured a somewhat questionable three-speed transmission that was often prone to locking the rear wheel if the rider shifted gears too quickly. 

Furthermore, the suspension was also very soft and its damping was deficient, which reduced friction with the ground on uneven surfaces. To include the Cub on this list, one had to act with reason, not emotion. 

Today there is a commemorative electric version of the Cub with a design very similar to the older models.

Here we have another old project. The Ariel Arrow was produced in 1958 and 1965. Experts point to its maneuverability as one of the motorcycle's strong points. 

However, a design flaw completely undermined its marketability: the exhaust was too low and scraped the asphalt. This left motorcyclists extremely distressed, and the motorcycle soon began to be rejected. 

Because of this detail and the resulting rejection by motorcyclists, the Ariel Arrow is one of the worst motorcycles ever produced. 

The Kawasaki 750 Triple proved to be a major problem for its owners. If you only had to ride it in a straight line, you wouldn't have any problems. 

The problems started when cornering. Although lightweight, the model was extremely unstable both on highways and in urban areas. 

Experts point to the completely flexible frame as the source of the problem. But the brakes and engine handling were also poor. So the result could only be one thing: a failure. 

The Suzuki GT380 had several chronic problems. The first of these was the long ground clearance due to the muffler. 

Furthermore, the swingarm was quite flexible and the front brake did not perform well on wet surfaces. 

With these unique characteristics, the public quickly rejected the GT380, and it ended up becoming a negative milestone in the Japanese manufacturer's production. Although they are considered classic motorcycles, it's best not to even think about buying one. 

The Greeves was a motorcycle that presented difficulties even for the most experienced riders, and the 1967 model was especially difficult to tame due to a problem with the front fork. 

The unique design of the front fork and suspension didn't function properly during braking, causing instability in the front wheel and increasing the risk of falls. 

So, gradually, people started avoiding the motorcycle that today has a reputation for being one of the worst in the world. 

The Husqvarna 250 MX was known for its speed, something considered a positive for any rider. 

However, the motorcycle was also known for its difficult handling. In a straight line, the 250 MX had docile behavior, but in curves it did not perform very well, and this was caused by a suspension problem. 

The suspension's shock absorption was poor, which meant that any bump became a major problem. Therefore, the motorcycle was extremely uncomfortable to ride. 

Speaking of discomfort, the seat, considered innovative for its time, was designed to prevent the rider from slipping, but like the motorcycle itself, it was also uncomfortable.

As a result, the Husqvarna 250 MX was quickly rejected by the public. 

Just because a motorcycle is powerful doesn't mean it's synonymous with success, and the Kawasaki 500 H1 is a practical example of this. 

The motorcycle was extremely powerful. However, its handling was poor because the frame twisted easily, and to make matters worse, its braking system was deficient. Thus, the motorcycle was a near-deadly combination. 

It's not uncommon for motorcyclists to claim that the front wheel loses stability above 4500 RPM. This led to significant rejection of the motorcycle, and the Suzuki 500 H1 came to be considered one of the brand's most problematic designs. 

Anyone who's been riding motorcycles for a while will probably remember it. The Moto Guzzi V50 Monza was built with the intention of minimizing the vibration that was transferred to the rider. 

So a rubber mount was installed on the handlebars with the intention of absorbing the vibration before the rider felt it. But this didn't end up working out as planned. 

Instead of absorbing the vibration, the rubber mount transmitted the vibration throughout the handlebars, making them unstable. 

Between you and me, having a motorcycle with unstable handlebars doesn't seem like a good idea for any motorcyclist, does it? So the V50 Monza is yet another one of the worst motorcycles ever produced. 

Unlike cars, which have a range of protective features, motorcycle riders are considered the bumpers themselves in case of accidents or falls. That's why it's so important to have a stable and safe motorcycle to ride. 

As you may have noticed, we at Senhor Carros will begin talking about motorcycles, and so we ask for your help right away. 

What topics related to the world of motorcycles would you like to see here? Leave a comment with your opinions and suggestions. Your participation is very important to all of us. 

And since we're talking about the worst motorcycles ever produced, how about learning about the worst cars ever made in Brazil? To find out which ones they are, just click the link below.